MST. NASEEM FATIMA THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS versus SHEIKH ALA-UD-DIN
Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), in the interest of the landlords executing the order to evict the tenants, the predecessor had purchased from the profession through the sale deed registered in the interest of the buyers. The tenants occupying the house through the rented tenants dragged the houses into various civil litigation cases and failed twice to the level of the Supreme Court effect, with three courts against the tenants being discovered. Questions of fact were included. Because it was enough for the Supreme Court not to deny it. The same principle was also applied to the High Court, which refused to interfere with the findings of the facts presented by both the courts below, not just the cursor but by discussing the entire profession and in light of the present record of the case. The present case was a case where the tenants were dragged unlawfully to the extent that the landlords could neither receive the rent nor enjoy the possession of the property. ? A registered landlord refused to interfere with a High Court decision passed by a rightful owner and appealed the rents to be burdened with heavy costs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
