MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus THE STA\'T\'E
Section 497 Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 bail, defendant's grant was in custody for more than 6 months, but the trial was not started. Investigating officer was unable to identify. Was. The accused was a former record holder or involved in a similar case where the alleged recovery was not related to the accused and it is unlikely that the accused went there as a visitor. It cannot be denied that the accused was charged. Do not fall under the prohibition clause of section 497 (1), the trial of the PC was not started, the accused could not be detained as a punishment action was allowed on the accused under bail. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Killa Saifullah lawyer