MESSRS HINOPAK MOTORS LTD. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Article 9 [as amended by the Labor Laws (Amendment) Ordinance (XXIII of 1993), the Labor Laws (Amendment) Ordinance (VII of 1994) and the Labor Laws (Amendment) Act (XI of 1994)] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petitioner who was an employer and was contributing to the drawing of wages not exceeding Rs. 1500 in insurance work at the rate of 5% of his wages under Section 9, Employees \ Old Age Benefit Act 1976, The amendment was banned by the Ordinance under which he became responsible for contributing to all employees whose wages did not exceed Rs. 3,000 a month and The President should be respected in selecting the law passed to approve the abdomen as a parliament. Take time to consider its provision without its approval or approval. A vacuum cannot be maintained. And in such cases the ordinance was re-designated upon termination. The ordinance was a legitimate part of the legislature, constitutional applications were rejected under circumstances. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
