Find a Lawyer

ASIF IQBAL versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 11/16 bail, grant of further inquiry records shows that the co-accused woman fled with the accused on illegal proximity. Had worked under the circumstances, crime against the accused. Adultery (Enforcement Hood) shall be subject to section 16 of the Ordinance, 1979, and the application of section 11 of the ordinance has been questioned not to be a prohibited clause of section 497 under section 16 (enforcement) of adultery. Used to come (1), CCP did not have direct evidence of adultery on record against the accused, but the female defendants refused to conduct a medical examination by themselves, which created harassment against Raza, but Supposedly, whoever was strong, could not seek proof. When direct evidence of adultery was not available on record against him, the accused was sued, in the circumstances covered under section (2) of section 497, the CRC further demanded his crime. The accused, who has been behind bars for the past 2/2 years, was a previous offender, the accused was admitted on bail, under the circumstances. famous high court advocate from Jhal Magsi lawyer