Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMED VOHRA versus CRESCENT INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED

The documents in section 18 and on the record reveal that the three sponsored directors of the company are handling three separate loan accounts in their own names and the bank has divided the amount of the facility separately and also signed the separate agreement and Was implemented. Documents for the relevant facility The default director rule that allowed them was that all three accounts were treated as one transaction, and payment against such three deals was considered to be a total liability payment to the bank and the bank. Whoever received more money was found to be responsible for settling a director's account, the director was already entitled to additional payment from the other director, making a transaction to the sponsor directors' three accounts. Could not be understood and he is a director. OneDirect was not entitled to adjustment for the alleged excess payment in the account or the bank did not file a lawsuit against the other director, nor was there any law before the court in respect of its debt. For which the money in one account can be transferred to another account for settlement. When a specific account has been consciously paid famous lower court advocate from Karachi lawyer