MEHRAB KHAN THROUGH ATTORNEY versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Applicant / Applicant's record as codel formally provided in the Sindh Irrigation Act, 1879, for the transfer of the Preacher's Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition from one water course to another water course. Shows that its other risky water courses objected to the transfer of the patch, which resulted in litigation between the applicant, and the Water Course District Officer (Revenue) detective who was the authorized officer. Allowing the patch to move. The rival Khattars filed a review under the Sindh Irrigation Act, 1879, and the reviewing authority allowed the petitioner to review the petitioner. The petitioner filed a constitutional petition stating that due to the influence of the neighboring countries, they were given their land from the original water course. Is not allowed to irrigate. The cisterns and the department were unable to perform their duty without providing irrigation. The applicant, for this patch, requested that proper portion of the actual patch applicant's water, irrespective of the situation, be given to the High Court Irrigation Department. May direct that the applicant's ownership of the property was justified, in law, to his due share of the water under his original water course, which the Department continued to supply to the Irrigation Applicant according to its obligations. And if anyone offers resistance, he should be prosecuted with the help of police. S. The High Court, however, directed the Irrigation Department officials to ensure that the applicant got a fair share of water from the people of his original water course,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
