Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus MUHAMMAD UMER MORIO

R 4 (1) (b) (i) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 Indemnity Civil Servant, on Hajj holiday, made Hajj and then, went to Germany and the United States. He said that he had not obtained prior permission from the relevant authority to visit the countries. He had obtained visas for the two countries a year before he went to Hajj, and as such, he had ample time to inform the authorities of such countries of such visits and circumstances when he deliberately caused them. I did not inform the authorities. He is best known for his treatment of a public servant, which was a gross misconduct by him and even on such accusations he could be dismissed / dismissed from the job when he was just b. From S 19 to BS 18 when the former was on vacation from Pakistan. Granted, an employee can only visit the country that is said to have received a holiday. As a civil servant, it was not pleasant to visit other countries; in the present case, as a police officer, he should show his conduct as belonging to a disciplinary force of Pakistan civil servant. As the department was under the auspices of the Supreme Court, the court turned the plea into appeal and dismissed it. power of attorney advocate Patoki lawyer