Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SHABBIR versus STATE

Section 2 30b (b) The evidence could not be recovered if the evidence was proved to be a crime because neither the person was examined nor the counselor's recovery, neither the pistol was presented to the court nor the accused. He was encountered while recording his statement. Neither the ballistic expert was sent nor any report was in the record, nor was such evidence excluded since the alleged confessional statement of the accused could not be considered because it was delayed by ten days. Otherwise, the confession recorded by the accused was also a crime and does not match the evidence and the accused did not compete with the confession offense in his examination under Section 342, the PC's confession statement was recorded. I did not conclude in the post-mortem report for the purpose of verifying the medical officer. He also sustained injuries to his forehead, but since his injuries did not lead to counseling, there was no evidence available to recover the crime, it was not known that one of the prosecution witnesses How many shots were fired during the chief's examination, but he was not tendered for cross-examination without any reason, the prosecution's witness said, adding that the second prosecution witness, who was an eyewitness, was the first prosecutor. Was left with a particular charge that he had won, but later returned without realizing it. He was. The court said that it had been released by the prosecution at a later stage, the evidence of such witness could not be trusted and had to be rejected, another facial solicitors from Khair Pur lawyer