MUHAMMAD LATIF ALIAS MITHU versus THE STATE
Section 497 Prohibition Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/148/149 Guarantee, the defendant's denial was shot in the back of his right shoulder, resulting in a post-mortem inspection report. The principle was. The case of the accused was also not applicable because the case of the co-accused, whose bail was granted, was different because he, in three successive investigations, was declared innocent, due to the fact that the victim was the accused. There was no injury, forward his request for bail because the accused was also charged under Section 324, PPC for causing serious injury to the injured, in addition to the way the accused did. He was treated himself, accused of being able to bear the devil's responsibility. Without the imagination to be ultimately settled by the court, the accused's case can be considered as superior or better than the case of a co-accused whose bail has been granted. The accused was dismissed accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Attock lawyer
