Find a Lawyer

MALIK NASIM IQBAL versus UNITED BANK LIMITED

Section 22A (8) (G) and 22D National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) Termination of Employment Practicing unfair practice on the part of employees, proof of applicant services He was dismissed following an inquiry into his charge sheet and allegations of corruption against a petitioner who served as a gunman, was it that he had physically hired the manager of the relevant branch of the employer bank As an attacker. The applicant and he signed every page of the inquiry report, which acknowledged the correctness of the applicant's statement that he had not been given the opportunity to make a false statement and present his defense. Was granted, the applicant also admitted that he was present with two showcase notices. The Inquiry Officer stated in his report regarding his inquiry that allegations were made against the applicant / accused Reg. The manager had proved by the applicant that he was lied to and questioned. And the lie was issued a show cause notice, the petitioner backed the bank misconduct and manager's case. Against this, proof of any illegal practice by the employer bank was not proved by the applicant through any evidence that the applicant, in his explanation, also gave a specific example of a word of unfair practice by the bank. Without, in his own words, he was not accused of unfair labor charges. An inquiry is considered and cannot be accepted as inquiry report to the applicant us immigration advocates from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer