Find a Lawyer

SYED MEHMOOD ALI versus NETWORK TELEVISION MARKETING (PVT.) LTD AND ANOTHER

The contempt of court contempt of section 499 defamation proceedings for damages of Articles 3, 4 and 9 of the Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), 2002 has been declared notorious under the Constitution Act (Against the Defamation Honor Ordinance, Sections 3, 4 and 9 of 2002) when it is established that it has been committed, its injury or reputation has been damaged, and that goodwill has been considered. , Defamation Honor Ordinance, merged in 2002. In the present case, it is acknowledged that an undocumented documentary involving unknown persons was made known. The plaintiff's concern and product was televised, but, offering a justification, fair comment, or any other defensible defense in such proceedings will not eliminate the effect of defamation altogether, but it will be an offense. And / or mitigating circumstances. Although it was justified (after being disqualified), no evidence has come out from any other evidence, which the author of the script has stated, is against the defendant (after being defiled). The case was stopped, once the notoriety was proved, the loss, injury and reputation reputation, as a goodwill or estimation of a person, profession or equipment, as well as the documentary that was presented, was a telecast. Was not, so there was no difficulty in arriving at the conclusion that twice the telecast, the dark documentary, the plaintiff's estimation, credibility and goodwill Qsan the product and is in conflict with the criminal responsibility, civic responsibility insults, backbiting and honor the intention of relying on the fact of not guilty of defamation law immigration advocates email from Sakardu lawyer