Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 / 337A (i) / 337A (ii) / 337F (i) / 337L (2) / 148/149 guarantees, FIR grants Was entered. The late accused were not hurt in any of the cases, but the charges against the accused in the FIR were kept in simple terms without any specific attribute. Was unrelated and nothing was recovered from his possession during the investigation. The recorded opinion is that the accused was not physically present at the relevant time and did not take part in the alleged incident, but at a later stage the deputy superintendent of police was investigating the case and the crime against the accused. Was recorded on the basis of which the accused could only. Do not prove to him that he was not present at the relevant time, the Deputy Superintendent of Police was curious about such a view as it appears that he has questioned himself about the role of the judiciary. And he abandoned the role of the Investigator Gate Adjudicator to decide which party had successfully set up his case before the Inquisitor had the duty to find out the facts and the truth himself. Instead of the need to set up rival claims before him, the challan had already been presented after the completion of the investigation, the continued custody of the accused in the jail could not guarantee any beneficial purpose, against the accused under the lawsuit. Further Section 49 Cr, Section () of the CRPC called for further investigation of his crime, admitted bail F. criminal advocate from FR Kohat lawyer