LIEUTENANT IFFAT KAZMI versus SHUJA AKBAR SHAH
Section Maintenance Allowance, Rs 25,000 per month was fixed as per the amount of the Family Family Court, which was fixed by the appellate court under the constitutional jurisdiction, which was reduced to Rs 15,000 monthly. It was paid Rs 10,000 per month in rehabilitation, it was important to know the financial status of the husband as well as the wife was a regular officer in the Armed Forces while the husband was a doctor working abroad in the UK and Their position was a clear High Court while the constitutional jurisdiction could not be exercised. This is no different result, as no such circumstances were presented, whereby the amount could be further reduced to Rs. 10,000 per month, the amount fixed by the appellate court was in favor of the parties and The High Court had no reason to reduce the amount which led to the change of the Supreme Court. Appeal for leave to appeal in appeal and judgment passed by the High Court was set aside The lower appellate court was reinstated Appeal was allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Mir Ali lawyer