Find a Lawyer

SYED FAYYAZ HAIDER versus PHA AND ANOTHER

Section 22A (8) (G) and 22D Complaint Appellant's rejection specifically claimed that he had been promoted as a security supervisor and that he had worked in that capacity for the last ten years. I was doing. Appellant claimed that he was employed in the LDA. After its formation, its services were transferred to the department. Authorities claimed that the appellant was not promoted, but it was only a stop gap arrangement, so it is important to consider whether the stop gap arrangement could continue for ten years without any regularity. ? This post and to see if the services of the appellant could be transferred to a newly constituted authority which would have been less enjoyable in the parental department. All such matters could only be decided. When the appellants are allowed to include their evidence and the authorities can deny that a single bench of the commission submitted the correctness of the documents that were included with the application. Advertisements, and such a concept was not a proper judicial approach, even if the documents had to be relied upon in handling the complaint request, the Single Bench had the responsibility to tender these documents in evidence or to enter them from the competing parties. Find out the evidence in evidence. By rejecting the stay request and dismissing the complaint request without accepting the evidence headed by the parties, the single bench had termed the appeals against the serious bench order as biased. After obtaining evidence from both sides, a single bench with direction to dismiss it was remanded. property advocate from Harnai lawyer