CHIEF POSTMASTER (DELIVERY), LAHROE G.P.O. versus SYED AKHTAR NAQI NAQVI, MEMBER NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, LAHORE
Sections 49 (4) (E) and 63 (1) (A) (B) (C) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Employees unfair practice practice Prior to this, the employees had made Section 49 (4). ) Was filed with (e) the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002, as well as with the request for ad interim relief before the members, the National Industrial Relations Commission, which ordered the ban in their favor, the employer ordered Filed a constitutional petition against him and failed to present to the employees despite the issuance of various notices. , The High Court upheld the commission's order and the central constitutional petition was postponed, followed by employees section 49 (4) (e) and 63 (1) (A) (B) (C) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 Another application was filed under A different member of the National Industrial Commission, which did not include a word for employers to file a constitutional petition, and passed a ruling that constitutional petitioners have the protection of prevention by hiding material facts. Such fact was sufficient to show that the fact that the employees did not approach the Member Commission with open hands was accepted by the employers and the constitutional request was accepted by the other members of the National Relations Industrial Relations Commission. Was isolated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
