Find a Lawyer

TARA CHAND versus KARACHI WATER AND SEWERAGE BOARD, KARACHI

Arts 185, 188 and 25 of the Supreme Court Rules 1980, A. XXXIII, R 5 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O XLI, R 33 The revision petition was in the applicant's civil service appointments that he discharged his appeal. No notice of acceptance of. The Supreme Court did not comply with the Supreme Court order. That he was one of the applicants who ignored the panchayat and dismissal court orders before the High Court, whom the Supreme Court granted in an appeal. The moment he found out about the Supreme Court decision, he approached the court and filed a civil review petition from time to time and, although he is a non-appealing party in appeals, Yet he was entitled to the same relief, on the basis of the principle of equality, that the services of all such persons were conveyed by a single order, viz., There was no difference between their case and the appeals and when they came to the tribunal. Or if the court makes a decision, the enforcement of a law governing the terms of service of a public servant, which includes not only law-abiding public servants Mains, as well as other government employees, have been covered, who may not have taken any legal action, ruling on the rule of justice and governance. Demand that the benefit of this decision be extended to other public servants, who cannot be parties to the trial, rather than to the tribunal or another legal forum. That constitution was also clear on the point that before the law all citizens were equal and they were entitled to equal protection of the law. famous lower court advocate from Mangla lawyer