PEARAL versus STATE
The trial court was ordered to terminate the trial of the accused within six months, but the fact was, the section 497 preventive rule (XLV of 1860), section 302 bail, the request for a pre-arrest warrant filed by the accused. It is because of this it was not possible. That the accused was not presented to the trial court on numerous occasions and even this charge was not included in the constitution to immediately and properly prosecute, since the date of his arrest Behind the bars was 11 7. Since 2001, his bail was extended because of an error which could not be alleged in any way, under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Shakargarh lawyer
