Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MALIK NAVEED AHMED versus MRS. NASREEN HAMEED


Sections 106, 112 and II6 Civil Procedure Code (V of 19 (181 O XX, R 12- Organization of Pakistan (1973)) Article 185 (3) The legal right to a resident tenant suffering from occupation and recovery of mason profit Defaults on the effect of monthly rent on the property) were leased to the defendants for two years by the courts in search of facts below the suit property, which was extended by two more years and rent The defendant agreed to vacate the house at the end of the extended lease period, but did so in cash to clear the house and pay the telephone charges. In addition to the amount, the monthly rent for four months, the trial court canceled the case in favor of the plaintiff and the order, as well as the payment of Rs 40,000 monthly for the payment of default telephone charges and recovery profits until the delivery of possession. The decision was made by the Judge and the High Court issued by the trial court and the defendant submitted that the F proved the actual loss suffered by the defendant in the possession of the suit property. Had presented no evidence to do so, nor could the trial court obtain a double rent on the parties' agreement and The High Court has also recorded the agreement together. Determining the correct facts from the evidence that the defendant continued to occupy the suit property without the consent of the plaintiff after the determination of the lease, the courts had the right, in the case of leave of suit property, to hand over the defendant's possession to the defendant. Be responsible. And then the receipt of telephone charges between the parties was also determined through notice, the respondent said.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Dir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.