SHTAMAND versus ZAHIR SHAH
O XLI, R 27 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the additional evidence principle in filing an application for additional evidence was filed on 6 lakh 1994, and after giving the plaintiffs an appropriate opportunity of hearing, further Unlawful delay in filing application for evidence and presenting evidence, the trial court dismissed the case. During the appeal hearing before the appellate court, the plaintiffs filed an application for additional evidence aimed at presenting additional evidence. Had to be done because a registered sales deadline appellate court dismissed the petition and revised the order. It was also excluded by the High Court play taken by the plaintiffs that the delay in dismissing the application for additional evidence cannot be construed as credible. Nine years later, Velvety's plaintiff woke up from a deep sleep and moved the request for additional evidence. The only respondents responding to the delay in filing the petition, the same reply was accepted by the trial court's decision on the costs, indicating the fact that the sale process was intended to be an additional The evidence was taken into consideration and was therefore dismissed because it had no alliance with the property, therefore, the sale process has no bearing on the merits of the matter being registered or otherwise. Wanted to fill in the blanks and lacunae that could not be made by requesting the provisions of O XLI, R 27 CPC He was. Extra evidence cannot be allowed on extraordinary grounds, and the following courts may, in the absence of any appropriate justification, grant additional evidence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Ukba lawyer