Article 5 and Schedule (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan, the constitutional application suit for recovering the amount of dowry articles and the dower, the plaintiff had prepared enough material to prove his claim, which the plaintiff had All the witnesses who testified permanently supported his claim, saying that the witnesses were interrogated substantially by the defendant, but that he failed to avail himself of such practice and his testimony remained inconsistent. , Both courts cited extensive evidence when dealing with dowry and Dawar cases, testified on trial record Arif's assessment and interpretation was based on valid reviews by the court and the appellate court, there was no denying that the plaintiff's claim in the first period of the trial between the parties was satisfied and that the defendant had his Was relieved of responsibility as was taken by the two courts. The evidence on the record justifies and supported the constitutional petition against the two courts' concurrent decisions, which were dismissed under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
