Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus WAPDA

Sections 4 and 17 of the Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra-Court Appeals for the Acquisition of Land, Practicing Acquisition of Land Split in Pieces Government at Public Expenditure Government for Public Construction Purpose Was acquired under Offices of the Water and Power Development Authority and, under Sections 4 and 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, were issued a Government Residential Colony notification and an award for compensation was announced. ; The land was not acquired by the government, but it was acquired by the Water and Power Development Authority, which was a corporation, and the acquisition was intended to be a waste because it was in scattered pieces of land and some other part owned by the land. Was not retrieved. The destiny of the appellants was partially overturned by the High Court under the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. The acquisition of Kuwait cannot be declared illegal on the ground that the land was in scattered pieces of property owned by some others. There was no acquisition of property, which in turn led to the end of any country. The Good Actions Act by the Land Acquisition Officers correctly confirmed the action taken by the Land Acquisition Officers for the determination of compensation to be paid to the landowners. No new case can be established in the appeal, nor can the High Court verdict be postponed in any way. The petition, which had not been taken before, was rejected by the Division Bench of the High Court. The High Court Intra-Court Appeal was dismissed. top civil advocates from Dunyapur lawyer