Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALID ALIAS KHALID HUSSAIN versus PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, BAGNOTAR

A. XVII, R 3 Land Acquisition Act (I Constitution of 1894), Section 18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicants Demanding Acquisition of Land for Better Pay of Land Acquired Applicants to abolish reference to civil court / Dissatisfied with the amount of landlord's compensation An independent case was brought to the civil court by section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 in their acquired land, but they have the opportunity to present their evidence independently. But despite numerous occasions, he failed to present a case in his favor by presenting cautious evidence. As a result of non-production of evidence by the applicants, their case was dismissed under the CPC's application of O XVIT, R 3, O XVII, R 3, the CPC issued a decree ordering the trial. Given the status of the case under which the decision of the civil court was acting against the petitioners and when the claims of the applicants were still denied on the basis of the judgment and decree of the civil court, there was no benefit to the contrary. That the judgment and injunction can be claimed by the applicant, as opposed to the rights of the opposing party on the basis of clear judgment and decree against the applicant. The decisions that have come into the presence of interpretation, can not be against. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Attock lawyer