DUR REHMAN versus MESSRS SALFI TEXTILE MILLS LTD
Section 49 (4) (e) of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, was charged with unfair labor practice by Reglin 32 employees for their submission of a referendum application. Later, the hiring officers started hunting. He further threatened to withdraw the referendum request from the registrar of trade unions or else his services would be terminated. To prevent applicants from serving them and to prevent the employer from withdrawing the petition in connection with the referendum by secret ballot petitioners, the accused was sworn in, allegations and general allegations were made against the employer and His trade union activities had no role to play. The man was a petitioner, a candidate supported by the petitioner, who admitted that he did not specifically mention his victim. The applicant had in his affidavit mentioned the names of the officers and any Did not mention the particular type of abuse but given that the employer was unable to establish a case of unfair labor practice by the applicant under normal circumstances, Bald was accused of unfair labor practice. Was created, the National Industrial Relations Commission could only assume jurisdiction When there was an element of unfair labor practice
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sajawal lawyer