Find a Lawyer

AMIR BADSHAH versus AMIN-UL-HAQ

Sections 6 and 13 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 were filed for the trial of the constitutional petition, preventing the plaintiff from recording the issue of his statements, various statements made by his son / the plaintiff. About his son was born and deposed. Upon the completion of the evidence of the parties, a petition was filed by the plaintiff to allow himself to give evidence in connection with the pond given by him. Defendants have raised the objection that the plaintiff has given his special son the authority to resign by an authorized special powers lawyer. There was no need or need for the law to allow the plaintiff to correct the facts on his behalf, which he had already dismissed by his competent lawyer as a lawyer. The son was not given an option lawyer. Without going into the dispute, whether the plaintiff's son was legally authorized by the attorney with special privilege to be deposed by the plaintiff. Suffice it to say that if it was said that the power of attorney was hanged, it would only be considered useful to the extent of the "seeking power" and the raising of other \ students \ ie \ i \ interest would not be enhanced. ? Or b bash Ish Ashid \ as a student b was purely personal, a process of personal nature, which can only be defined by the party itself and not by the person on whose behalf the lawyer is the plaintiff. At least the attorney cannot increase. i Muwait allowed the plaintiff to record his evidence through his father / defendant trial, but the trial court ruled ask a advocate free from Makli lawyer