HAJI MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus RANA MUHAMMAD SARWAR
O XXXVII, R 3 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) and XXXVII, R3 (2), for the recovery of the amount of leave on the allotted leave to defend the provisions of the CPC The suit was either unlawful or subject to such conditions or the demand of the court for payment or payment of security was not unlawfully defendant in the present case; the court did not object to the order Was, give this condition to the court and authorize it. Various motions were sought by the court for the submission of the security and compliance with the security order, because the court order was not properly complied with by the District Judge and the High Court There was no valid reason to verify. The court dismissed the appeal for leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Phool nagar lawyer
