GHANSHAMDAS versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT-VIII, LARKANA
Clause 48 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) restraining the application for restitution was excluded for non-prosecution. Was unsuccessful, so was dismissed and the High Court refused to reject the order passed by the Labor Court. After the hearing of the law, the court of the Supreme Court was not appealed, therefore, it cannot be allowed to get agitated after the proceedings before the High Court. The evidence on record provided several reasons for which the Supreme Court did not find any legal weakness, as it failed to collect labor costs, and therefore, deserved arbitrary relief from the Supreme Court in its favor. No, because he didn't come clean. Appeal rejected by hand
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Piplan lawyer
