LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HYDERABAD versus GUL MUHAMMAD
Sections 9 and 25 (1) (3) increase the rate of compensation for acquisition of land due to a notice issued under section 9 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in response to such notice / landlord specific to the landlord. Claims to be compensated at rate. The jurisdiction of the court in relation to the increase of compensation in section 25 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was limited. Such provisions would not have any question of waiver, so the court in view of section 25 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 It was made necessary for the court to enforce such notice as the landlord had such a legal duty, and it was not a benefit to any party, the landlord Shall not be entitled to make any further claim in pursuance of the notice service. The High Court had no jurisdiction to increase the rate of such claim for compensation on a cross objection specified by the landlord's principles.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Zahir Pir lawyer
