Find a Lawyer

SHAMSUD DOHA versus STATE

Section 302 was promptly lodged a testimonial of evidence to the police and the complainant had no opportunity to communicate and make false allegations with which he had no enmity with which the complainant was the prosecutor's witness. Was presented and the report contained controversial content. The statement made by the complainant in the material details did not provide any strong evidence by the defense that the witnesses were not present on the spot. The statement of the defense witness was hardly affected. The defense witness was related to the accused and the venue. Lived about a kilometer away. At or near the incident, the witness was not found guilty of his presence, the complainant who was the grandfather and the prosecution witness was also the deceased's uncle and although there was an interesting witness, nothing was on record to show that They had both made false accusations. The witnesses have long been subjected to torture, but their statements do not prove to be fruitful. These statements have influenced the testimony of the witnesses and there is no denying the true cause of their testimony. The eyewitnesses were free and unwanted and there was no possibility of their being found false, the allegation was completely proved. Without a witness of any interest against the accused without any evidence of any kind of collusion, it cannot be made the basis of a large-scale accusation, but in the present case, despite the close ties of the witnesses, they have lied in this case. As the accused was not motivated, both witnesses made it. Permanent statements before the court and their credibility are numerous pakistani advocates Attock lawyer