Find a Lawyer

SAEED AHMED versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL-V), BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE

Sections 42, 161 and 164 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, R6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution affirming the inheritance Remand Factual Inquirer Revenue Officer approves the change in the legacy of the deceased woman from sharing her only daughter Didi and the surviving daughters challenged this change on the basis that the deceased belonged to the Shi'ite profession and was entitled to full ownership and he was not heard in such a provocative proceedings because of a tactical inquiry. His appeal was accepted after that and the remand for judgment was taken after the case. Such an order was reversed in an appeal by the Commissioner, whose order was rejected by the Member Board of Revenue and after inquiry the case was remanded to the Assistant Collector. The contention of validity is that under the Rule 6A of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Rules 1968, the remand could not be obtained by the Assistant Assistant Commissioner as all orders were approved by donkeys under the orders of the Stunt Commissioner and Additional Commissioner Member of the Board of Revenue. Were confessed to confessing to the Revenue Officer's remand, confessing that there was no illegal, malicious or arbitrary outcome that no one was condemned to hear. Will go Dismiss in the circumstances advocate from Rabwah lawyer