Find a Lawyer

MRS. SHABANA AMIR versus MESSRS SALFI TEXTILE MILLS LTD.

Sections 49 (4) (e) and 63 National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regln The practice of unfair labor on behalf of 32 employees filed a petition against the applicant that her husband was employed. I was the General Secretary of the Workers Union. After submitting a charter of demands to the establishment, where she was serving as a telephone operator, employers' officers began harassing and threatening her and asking her husband to withdraw the charter of demands, otherwise The services of the applicant will be terminated, the applicant prayed for the employers to be dismissed, the applicant alleged that the applicants had been dismissed, dismissed, terminated or relocated and committed an unfair practice. The task was in the form of unfair labor practices, which are part of the self-petitioning workers' union. The body was not claimed and was an active member of the Workers' Union. In his endorsement he did not produce any documents and did not even create the buyers of the union Petitioner received in support of his claimant neither in his plea nor in his affidavit, His specific active role was mentioned in the union, but he charged only ordinary and bald allegations and the time and date of the alleged threat were not mentioned. The petitioner had failed to establish an unfair trial case against the employers in his plea, but without any specific instance of trade union activity by the applicants, the vague and punitive alleg allegations were filed by the employer. Also non-existent immigration advocates email from Shahpur Chakar lawyer