Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MUHAMMAD KHALIQ

A VII, R 11 & OI, R 9 Special Relief Act (I of 1877) Claims that the suit filed three cases for declaration with a permanent injunction in civil court for the declaration of dismissal of applicants. Whether through the transfer of property granted by the General Attorney. Prior to the approval of the motion, the powers were reversed and the cases were already stopped due to the decision of the trial court and their decisions were challenged by the Court of Appeal. The court affirmed the appeal, rejecting the limitations and appeals. No evidence of the existence of the earlier cases was on file and there was no evidence that the summary of the post-proceedings was in complex questions that were committed after the recording of the evidence, leaving it open for decision by the civil court. Had given. Applicants 'view was not barred from the final decision on taxation in the civil court. The provisions of Order Article I Rule 9 did not make CPC a ground for rejecting the plaintiffs' judgments of their jurisdiction. Was used to commit material irregularities and unlawful acts and the orders of both the courts were set aside. online advocate from Murree lawyer