Find a Lawyer

AISHA AND OTHERS versus MOLVI ABDUL SATTAR

Applicant's correction after section 166 calorie error three years, six months and three days interval, without giving any reason for such an unusual delay under section 166 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 A correction was filed. , Can be filed at any stage, but if the attempt was made to correct it and the valuable rights were obtained, then surely the principle of Locus Pointei would fall under the record. It was not stated that the respondent was an area of permitted land. The applicants, jointly with the respondents and the applicants, believed that the exclusion of their names was a deliberate mistake / mistake, was invalid No application was found in the petition, the applicants of the provisions of section 166 of the West While doing this, add the name in random order. Request rejected because of situation in Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 best law firm from Landi Kotal lawyer