MESSRS STARCO LIMITED versus SINDH AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FARM, TANDO JAM THROUGH DIRECTOR FINANCE,
Sections 6 (2) and 7 (1) (2) against the order passed before the Full Board Order (Judicial) of the Member of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue (Appeal and Review), 1959, R5. Appeal or Revision) was a final order with some modifications to the Board of Revenue which was considered under section 7 (1) of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act, 1957. The review or review of any revenue officer / revenue court, including the Board of Revenue, was admissible / admissible against the order which was given in section 6 (2) of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act 1957, the Board of Revenue. Revenue was ordered since the amendment approved by the Board of Revenue was within the jurisdiction, so even under the provisions of section 7 (2) of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act 1957, no review was made on the full board. Which was read with the R5 of the Board of Revenue. Code of Conduct (Revision), 1959 was a competent chapter, so it was eventually closed in terms of revenue.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Haroonabad lawyer