Find a Lawyer

LATIF versus STATE

Section 302/324/353/148/149 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) [as amended by the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Ordinance. Definition (XXXXX of 2001)] The testimony of the prosecution only the prosecution witness, who was a police constable, claimed that he saw the accused in the motorcycle headlight which was a glimpse of the accused moment when he was the prosecution witness and the accused. Were involved in an identity conflict. The accusation of a motorcycle headlight was, of course, a weak type of evidence that required strong rigor, but it was severely lacking in the testimony of the CD's prosecutor, when it could be stated. When is the light for the alleged identity, neither was protected by the police nor presented in court, the Complainant / Section HA failed to remember how many vacancies were recovered from the clash against Word. The version given in the FIR and the post-mortem report did not explain the radiation that occurred at the time of the death of the deceased, As a result of the prosecution's case there is another preventable threat, the identity tests of the accused were conducted on different dates by police officers and advisers, they were located 25 km away. There were residents of the village. Such identification tests were useless, and relying on them was hardly a crime weapon retrieval because neither independent witness was associated with the witness's recovery nor weapons recovered from the accused's exclusive possession. Yes, the allegedly recovered weapons were never sent to a ballistic expert. Wow divorce advocates from Mangowal lawyer