SHEREEN ZADA versus THE STATE
Sections 497 and 103 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9, 25, 74 and 76 of the Prohibition (Head of Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 guarantee, denied by the defendant denied. That the area was associated with any person recovering from drugs, violations of section 103, CRPC's mandatory provisions were disputed because Section 25 of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997 of Section 25 The application was dismissed, CRPC was the application of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997. The latest and more comprehensive law on the subject of drugs than the Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979, and the effect of section 76 of this Act, regardless of anything contained in any other law. A large quantity of prohibited chars and liquor, including the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order, 1979, was recovered from the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Burewala lawyer
