Find a Lawyer

NASEEM AKHTAR KHAN versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Sections 4 (P), 22A (6) (iii), 154 and 551 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application powers reckless to order the registration of a case against a Sessions Judge / Former Officer Justice of Peace Officer. The respondents filed an application before the Sessions Judge, alleging that it was mandatory to file an FIR related to Section HO Section H, to find out that the FIR related to Section H's Section Judge. RK is fulfilling its legal obligations in registration. The defendant is required to file a lawsuit for negligence in complying with the provisions of Section 154 against the section HO relating to the relevant TPO, CCP Petitioner (Section HO) Had challenged an order stating that the session judge did not have jurisdiction over the order. Section 22A (6) (iii), in view of the special provisions of the CR PC, was invalid for the petitioner, which clearly provided for Sessions Judge Actin. As a Chief Justice, police officers can always issue appropriate directions to police officers on the complaint of negligence or failure in relation to the registration of a criminal case or their duties by police officers. Section HO may use the option of filing a case against applicant section HO top advocate from Kashmore lawyer