Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD AHMED HASHMI versus STATE

Section 4 51 bond Forfeiture Guarantee The applicant who was guaranteed the bail was considered to have jumped on the bail without having to approach the trial court for a refund of the bail, the accused's bail was canceled and the bail was canceled. The bail bail has been forfeited and the applicant has taken notice under Section 514, the CC Trial Court had to disclose the certificate of special savings to the court and submit the amount to the head of the state at the cost of the State Bank. Instructed There is no doubt that the reason may be why the penalty should not be imposed, but such notice was not presented if the presence of the applicant before the court is taken as notice, however unclean. The order was not sustained in law because the order was fined, not approved, the inappropriate order was put aside and the time to file a response to the etition show cause is why the entire amount of the bond was fined. Should not be imposed and upon submission of the answer, a reasonable order shall be approved by the trial court in harmony with the law. \ R \ n immigration advocates from Gari Mori lawyer