Testimonies of Section 302/34 Evidence There was a large discrepancy between some witnesses about the presence / presence of the police party (available in police mobile), which lasted 10-15 minutes, the moonlight I find it difficult to identify the culprits because at least six policemen and three criminals reportedly joined the encounter while the culprits were shooting from cultivation, but only a few were recovered and no camels were damaged. Neither the police mobile was harmed, in addition to the contradictions in the prosecution case, the fact that it was a nightly incident, Deid raised suspicion, identifying the suspect after a week of delay in his arrest. The suspect was detained more than two weeks after his arrest, and there was a possibility that all the witnesses who had taken the accused in the identification test had seen the accused further. E-Identification Test Such identification test cannot be accepted as good evidence so that the accused does not succeed in substantiating the allegations against the prosecution accused beyond reasonable doubt, appeal against this order of trial. Under which the accused were convicted and sentenced. , Was allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
