Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR AHMAD versus THE STATE

After reviewing the evidence on Articles 84 & 2 302, the death sentence of the accused in the murder of three persons was sentenced to death and the sentence was upheld by the High Court, the accused was guilty of the crime. At the time of the commission, he was unfounded. Therefore, under section PP84 PPC, he did not commit any crime. If the accused had taken such a case before the trial court, the court could have passed him a proper order by sending him to the hospital for proper mental treatment and After his recovery, the accused could punish him. The trial court has been summoned for trial, even in its statement under Section 342 CCPC, no insanity plea has been raised by the accused if there was any such defense version. It would have been brought to the record by statements of defense witnesses. In addition to the ocular evidence, there was evidence of Hatchet's recovery and positive information from the serologist and chemical executor to show that Hachette was used for the commission of the crime which, after a thorough review of the prosecution's evidence, the prosecution trial court. As well as the High Court's version, the accused was sentenced to a general death sentence. Evidence or wrong structure of the law was found in the verdict, the court refused to intervene in the sentence, and the appeal appealed by the trial court was denied. top civil advocates from Eminabad lawyer