Find a Lawyer

MESSRS KOHINOOR TEXTILE MILLS LTD, KARACHI versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX & CENTRAL EXCISE (ADJUDICATION), KARACHI

Section 32 invalid statement was found to be less than 25% printed on the Fabric Physical Examination in which section No. 2 (1) of section RO (1) pursuant to Section RO 172 (I) / 99 No. 22 of 1999 ? 80% FOB was attracted to the draw @ @ 5 versus 80 by the exporter claimed under section 4 of the same as the footage of the printed fabric section RO Effect Corf Area. In the note provided in the Explanation, Section 32 attracts the provision of the Customs Act, 1969. immigration advocates email from Layyah lawyer