Find a Lawyer

DEPUTY DIRECTOR-GENERAL (ADMINISTRATION), THROUGH ASSISTANT DEPUTY DIRECTOR-GENERAL (LAW) versus NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF POSTAL EMPLOYEES\' UNION THROUGH CENTRAL PRESIDENT OF NOPE LAHORE AND ANOTH

Responding to an appeal before the panel of the National Industrial Relations Commission of the respondents' union regarding the change of office of the Section 22D & 22EE Election for the collective bargaining unit, the defendants petitioned the change of officers to the Registrar of Industry Trade Union. Submitted, which requested the Registrar of Industry Ward Trade Unions to approve the change of Registrar of Industry-War Trade Unions, and another person appealed against the order of the Registrar of Industry-War Trade Unions before the National Industrial Filed. The Relations Commission objected to the administration / appellant that most of the elected officials were government employees who were either barred from contesting the elections or to become an union official in view of the federal government's notification dated 15th 2001. Was prevented from Able to issue or issue a law, notification and instructions on which the law shall prevail. The notification makes it clear that persons who are not coming under the definition of "workman", as included in the Workman's Compensation Act, 1923, are not entitled to participate in the elections, nor are they allowed to vote. Can put The vote appellant / management should have provided an opportunity to prove his point of view through the evidence if there was a contentious point that needed proof, there was still no point in recording the evidence in the summary proceedings here. Even during the process, the appellant / management raised the point election, a key point touching the root of the case, which should have been dealt with properly, but at the same time was excessively disposed of, Mmm attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Jaja Abasian lawyer