Find a Lawyer

EX-CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER, IKRAM-UL-HAQ versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE THROUGH CHIEF OF THE AIR STAFF, ISLAMABAD

Section 71 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 377 and 506 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 (1) (3) Constitution Petition Mentality Convention Petitioner was subject to Pakistan on the day of his arrest as an employee of Pak Air Force ? When he was arrested, prosecuted under the Air Force Act, 1953, and the military court petitioner declared his sentence illegal, void and had no legal consequence, sub-article (3) of Article 199 of the Constitution ) Was absolute to the discretion of the High Court's jurisdiction which can be invoked only and only in the case of an unlawful decision, a lack of jurisdiction in a court or a decision rendering the judgment unfair and in any other circumstances I have to face such a way of convicting a restraining decision. Defects, constitutional jurisdiction cannot be requested to release the applicant because of the disqualification from the applicant filed constitutional application conditions top advocate from Panjan Kisan lawyer