Find a Lawyer

AMIR ZAMAN KHAN versus STATE

The testimony of the interested witness had to be looked at carefully and carefully, as defined in Sections 302 (b), 324 and 34, the presence of the seals injured on the prosecutor's testimony would not necessarily mean that the witness spoke the truth. Is. Will talk about his presence on this occasion, and for the purpose of determining his truth, his testimony had to be seen in the vicinity, the testimony of the interested witness was not immediately dismissed. However, even the testimony of a party witness cannot be directly ruled out and may be. The statement of the witness will be deemed to qualify the conditions specified by the Supreme Court when the wrongdoing of a witness is attributable to factors such as misunderstanding or the moral deterioration of the witness. Earlier, any counsel was brought in to bring the complainant against the accused given in the FIR. The prosecution's witness described the trial court with a cautious inquiry, jointly examining the witness. Examined, but the instability or improvement or the distressing item of an earlier version could not be removed by defense. There was no difficulty in identifying the light of day and the accused did not feel any fault or moral error in the complainant's statement. The medical report also fully supported the complainant's statement. And there was also the number of injuries to the bodies of the prosecution witnesses, making the instability unsafe by the Investigation Officer, could not end the prosecutor's case because on a very busy road. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Hariwala lawyer