MUHAMMAD FAROOQ KHAN versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS
Article 199 Industrial Relations Ordinance (Section 25 19 1969), Section 25A & 37 (3) Constitution Petition Complaint Request Withdrawal of the applicant's latest request to enter a service, he withdraws the section on Industrial Relations Complaint filed under 25A. Ordinance, 1969 The Seed application was rejected by the Labor Court because it was withdrawn on some technical grounds with the permission to file a fresh application; The appeal was accepted that the complaint is requested and the appeal is dismissed. The tribunal accepted his petition to withdraw the petitioner's plea, but his plea was not accepted for fresh application to the same court. This enforced order of the Labor Appellate Tribunal was against the law under which applicants were requested to withdraw their application with the latest file entry. The request may be accepted or rejected in its entirety, This could not be denied because they could not be revoked, disregarding the permission to file a new application. The subsequent order was illegal and the High Court could, in its constitutional jurisdiction, revoke the same restraining order and the appeal of the complaint was to be considered and the decision was made according to the law after providing equal opportunity for hearing to both parties. Had to
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Jamshoro lawyer