Find a Lawyer

R.A. NOS. 153/LB TO 160/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 4TH MAY, 2004. versus R.A. NOS. 153/LB TO 160/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 4TH MAY, 2004.

Sections 66, 61, & 65 & 13 13 multiple Declaration of joint issuance for multiple assessment years shall be submitted to the High Court, where the assessee had to submit a declaration of income of up to eight years, then the assessee shall have eight years. Until one year of income could not be disclosed, separate income for each year and filing of separate returns on an annual basis. In addition to the law, it is important that the Assessing Officer should make a separate count of income for each year, even when a stable / assessment order has been passed, by calling an Assisi for up to eight years. Have to do. For the same period, after the same notice under Section 61 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, the AssisiCi was subjected to prejudice because the Assessing Officer was required to explain the income generated in the eight years before a hearing. I may feel interrupted. Think of it as a "case of accounts" where accounts and supporting documents had to be prepared for many years before the Assessing Officer for whom a joint notice was issued was certainly not something that would have been considered in the current case. Which the Tribunal had suffered from severe weakness because of severe signs of "tampering". If it has been pointed out that if such a result had not been contested by the Department, it is considered that the Department's assessment was accepted, in the circumstances, which were declared as invalid and unforgivable. The reference of the department to the High Court was rejected. \ r \ n. r \ n best law firms from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer