Find a Lawyer

FAZAL DIN versus ADVOCATE-GENERAL, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR MUZAFFARABAD

Definition of Section 302 Evidence The fact that there were three eyewitnesses present at the scene of the incident and their testimony was fully proved, no contradiction was found between the three witnesses on location, location and its mechanism. And their statements lacked complete consensus. Witnesses said statements of witnesses also stated that witnesses identified the allegedly used gun and recovered empty guns and empty cartridges and identified the time, place and location of the gun. There was no contradiction between the witnesses regarding the procedure. And the retrieval of an empty gun, as an offensive weapon, proved beyond any doubt that the gun was fired from a firearm's eyewitness testimony, which confirmed its presence. Had happened The post-mortem report was fully corroborated. The absence of eyewitnesses was abducted and accordingly, according to the disclosure, the three witnesses said that the three witnesses had good credibility and were never involved in any false evidence, saying that the witnesses made their prayers daily. Teach, that five times the eyewitnesses were brothers, but they were not brothers of the victim, not the defense of the witnesses present at the relevant time was denied the witnesses had no reason to deny my relationship with them. Had no enmity with the accused and nothing was on record to show that the witnesses were falsely implicated in the commission. They will be involved. It has been admitted that some of the plaintiffs have been sued by the parties in connection with the prosecution. criminal advocate from Shangla lawyer