Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus STATE

Article 5 435/4399 The parties to the direction of the criminal case were husband and wife, and the case for dissolution of the marriage filed by the wife against the applicant was pending in the judgment that the wife of the competent court had made the additional session. It was filed before the judge that the applicant and other persons entered the house forcibly. His parents, where he resided and looted home articles at gunpoint. The wife prayed that the police be instructed to file a criminal case against the applicant. The Additional Sessions Judge accepted his request and directed the police. That they file a criminal case against the applicant without their hearing. Police inquiry into the High Court's additional session judge's review has found that the applicant's wife's story was a false, provocative and unreasonable additional session judge, therefore, without the applicant's police hearing. Invalid order was not approved. Inquiries of the wife as false, abusive and unreasonable and her petition was declared untrue, the Nagara verdict would not stand in the jurisdiction of the law and demanded intervention from the High Court in which The review petition filed by the applicant was accepted, and has been set aside. Order advocate from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer