ZAFAR HUSSAINZAFAR HUSSAIN versus UMAR DRAZ
Sections 265 C, D, E, F, 439 and 540 Legal Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 161 called for witnesses and then another prosecution witness was examined, after examining all those testimonies, The complainant submitted a request for three more witnesses, which the prosecution's witnesses were summoned to investigate, they were neither mentioned in the FIR nor included during the investigation. , Nor was it mentioned in the calendar. Witnesses, but the complainant in his examination, the chief introduced their names. The complainant alleged that out of the three prosecution witnesses, the prosecutor's office did not file a case under Section 161, CRPC, though he insisted on recording his statements.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Jauharabad lawyer
