Find a Lawyer

ZULJAN versus TARIQ AHMED

The evidence on the record entitled Section 1 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), the Section 3 High Court's determination of the fatal accident and the amount of compensation had fully proved that the defendant involved in the accident was owned and other Was being driven in a shocking and disrespectful manner. The defendant, who presented the deceased's accident and the result of the death, was obtained by a single High Court judge that the car was not owned by the defendant and by the other defendant at the time of the incident, he was negligent. The car was not operating. On the misrepresentation of evidence and on the contrary it was able to be reversed and it was said that two things should be answered in the affirmative fact that the deceased left behind his father, mother, widow, daughter and a son. Born after death He remains a victim of controversy. At the time of his death, he was 25 years of age, the amount of compensation was determined by the single judge, taking into account his expected remaining life and his average income. The decision and the judgment were set aside and accordingly the case was decided as well. Deposits will be submitted to the beneficiaries who will make similar investments in the Government Savings Scheme for the benefit of minors. online advocate from Fateh Jang lawyer