Find a Lawyer

NOORUDDIN versus STATE

Articles 5 & 5 and 4 324 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 196565), Section 13 (d) Defining the evidence All the witnesses, except the two private persons, were policemen and said that the two private persons were careful and concrete. The accused was not involved through the evidence; the trial court denied the trial. This version of the prosecution in connection with the acquittal, which was alleged to have subverted the coach's driver, seized the driving seat and stopped the coach to the Agricultural Farm Trial Court, on one hand Given that the punishment given to the accused would run concurrently. And on the other hand, he calculated the total punishment for the accused and gave a specific total data of 38 years, because the trial court, with mental presence, sentenced the trial court to more than ten years in prison. Despite being sentenced, no sentence was given. There was more than one circumstance in the prosecutor's story allegedly committed by them, but only in a mind that raised suspicion, which would be enough to give the accused the benefit of the doubt. Given as a matter of fact, there is no solid evidence on record to uphold the trial court's decision and to uphold its conviction. The suspects were also set aside, and the accused was acquitted us immigration advocates from Rawat lawyer